Esc

↑↓ move↵ openIndex · Pagefind

Submittals without the chase

Most submittal pain is the chase: who has it, when it's due, and which revision is current. Follow one glazing submittal from spec section to distribution, and watch the ball in court move without a single status email.

Workflow explainer5 min scrollSample data · Riverside Medical Center

One submittal through review and resubmittal

  1. Step 1 · Submittals · sample data

    Start from the spec section

    On Riverside Medical Center, the storefront glazing product data is created against spec section 08 80 00 Glazing, with a type, a responsible contractor and a submittal manager. Create from Spec Sections can generate a draft for every section you pick at once.

  2. Step 2 · Workflow

    Put the people in order

    The submittal gets an ordered workflow: the glazing sub as submitter, then the PM and the architect as approvers, each with a due date. Use a saved workflow template or set the steps by hand. The first step is sent and holds the ball in court; later steps wait as Pending.

  3. Step 3 · Sub submits

    The ball moves on its own

    The sub responds with the product data attached. When everyone in the active step has responded, the next step is sent and the ball moves to the PM. Nobody has to email "it's with you now".

  4. Step 4 · GC review

    Approved as Noted

    The PM checks it against the contract documents and responds Approved as Noted with a comment. The ball moves to the architect. The workflow table shows each step's status, due date, returned date and response, so anyone can see where it stands.

  5. Step 5 · Architect review

    Revise and Resubmit

    The architect wants a different frame finish and responds Revise and Resubmit. Rev 0 comes back with that status, and the ball is back with the glazing sub. Other responses: Approved, Rejected, Forwarded for Review (to someone else, with a due date) and For Record Only.

  6. Step 6 · Revisions

    Create Rev 1, keep Rev 0

    Create Revision makes Rev 1 with its own workflow. The Revisions card lists every revision with its status and marks which one is current, so the field never builds from the superseded one.

  7. Step 7 · Approved

    Rev 1 goes through

    The sub resubmits, the PM and architect approve, and the submittal is Approved. Its delivery fields (lead time, required on-site date, confirmed and actual delivery) sit on the same record, so release for fabrication isn't tracked somewhere else.

  8. Step 8 · Close & Distribute

    Record who got it

    Close & Distribute sets the closed status, picks recipients and attachments, adds a message and records the distribution. It's a record of who received it; the app doesn't confirm external email delivery.

Why the chase costs days

One Revise and Resubmit, fifteen days

Long-lead material can't be released for fabrication until the submittal is approved. With a 14-day first review, a 5-day turnaround and a 10-day second review, one resubmittal pushes delivery past the required on-site date. Illustrative sample data, not from a real project.

Illustrative submittal timelineApproved first time: 14 days review plus 56 days lead time, on site at day 70, 5 days before the required day 75. With one Revise and Resubmit: 14 + 5 + 10 days of review plus 56 days lead time, on site at day 85, 10 days late.0d15d30d45d60d75d90dApproved first timeReview: 14 daysFabrication lead time: 56 daysday 70 · 5 days earlyOne Revise and ResubmitReview: 14 daysRevise and resubmit: 5 daysReview: 10 daysFabrication lead time: 56 daysday 85 · 10 days lateRequired on site
ReviewRevise and resubmitFabrication lead timeRequired on-site date
In the app

The submittal record

The record puts the chase on one screen: Ball in Court, Held, Review Due and Required on Site tiles across the top; the workflow, attachments and Close & Distribute below; spec section, responsible contractor, revision and schedule and delivery fields at the side. Create Revision is one click away.

A submittal record showing status Open, ball in court, held time, review due and required on site tiles, the workflow panel, Close and Distribute, and general information with spec section 08 80 00 Glazing and revision Rev. 0 current.
A submittal record: ball in court, revision, spec section and Close & Distribute. Recorded in the app · sample data

Where else it shows up

RFIs can link to the submittal from their Related Items, a meeting topic can link to it, and it can be tied to a scheduled task in the Schedule tool and to sheets in Drawings. Analyze on the submittal list opens the submittals pack in Analytics (preview).

Text version

The whole review, as a table

Storefront glazing product data (sample data)
StepStatusRevisionBall in court
1. Create from specDraftRev 0Nobody yet
2. Build the workflowOpenRev 0Glazing sub
3. Sub submitsOpenRev 0PM
4. GC reviewOpenRev 0Architect
5. Architect reviewRevise and ResubmitRev 0Glazing sub
6. Create revisionOpenRev 1 (current)Glazing sub
7. Rev 1 approvedApprovedRev 1 (current)Nobody
8. Close & distributeApproved · distributedRev 1 (current)Nobody

Keep going

Sample project included

Try this workflow on the sample project

Every trial workspace includes a sample project with sample data, so you can follow these steps in the app before touching a live job.

Try it on the sample project

Want this on live job data?

Submittals, workflows, revisions and packages are live in os.construction. Closing and distributing records who got it; it doesn't confirm email delivery.

Your role (optional)

14-day free trial. Pricing for paid plans isn't set yet. Talk to us. Already have an account? Sign in →

All figures are illustrative sample data, not a real project. Contract terms and state law decide how retainage, stored materials and change orders work on your job. Check both.

Ask the OS

Reading this page

Ask anything about this page. Answers use what you're reading as context.

Suggested

    AI · may be imperfect · sample data where shown

    Open file